Trump Signed Order Redefining Artificial Intelligence

A new executive order mandates that all official administrative documents replace the term artificial with super.

Updated on Oct. 6, 2026 in Artificial Intelligence

Bold flat-color editorial illustration featuring a large geometric plinth, representing the government's shift in technological nomenclature.
President Trump signed an executive order requiring federal agencies to replace the term 'artificial' with 'super' in all official references to artificial intelligence. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you believe politicians using specific labels to reframe issues changes how you vote?

President Trump has signed an executive order requiring the federal government to replace the word artificial with super in all official references to artificial intelligence. This administrative shift aims to reframe public perception of the technology.

Why it matters

The administration is leveraging linguistic control to shape political discourse and influence the framing of emerging technologies. By modifying official nomenclature, the policy seeks to attach positive connotations to advanced systems to mitigate public concern.

The executive order establishes a mandatory lexicon change across all executive branch documents. No specific quantitative benchmarks regarding the scale of document updates were provided.

The players

Donald Trump

The President of the United States who oversees federal administrative policy and the executive branch.

Elon Musk

The leader of SpaceX, a company developing launch vehicles and satellite constellations, who expressed an intent to rename SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI.

Sam Altman

The CEO of OpenAI, a research laboratory focused on the development of large-scale machine learning models, who stated he would not rename his organization.

The details

The directive functions by legally reclassifying the nomenclature used by federal agencies to describe AI. The administration has also linked this linguistic policy to broader oversight, using the denial of grants as a punitive mechanism for researchers and organizations that utilize disfavored terminology related to diversity or gender. This follows a broader pattern of renaming physical and institutional entities, including the Gulf of Mexico, Lake Ontario, and the Department of Defense.

Timeline

  1. October 6, 2026: The executive order was formally enacted.

  2. November 2026: Upcoming elections scheduled for the United States.

The Tech Race

This policy follows a precedent established by recent administrative renamings of federal departments and geographic landmarks. The directive forces a rift in industry branding, as major AI entities such as OpenAI have signaled resistance to the shift while others like SpaceX adapt.

The change primarily affects federal documentation, regulatory filings, and grant eligibility requirements. Researchers and companies dependent on government funding must now navigate these new naming conventions to remain compliant with administration policy.

The takeaway

The administration is prioritizing linguistic framing as a tool of political influence ahead of the November 2026 elections. Readers should monitor upcoming federal grant announcements for evidence of how compliance with the new terminology requirement is being enforced.

Further reading

For broader trends in industry regulation and nomenclature, visit Artificial Intelligence.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Axios.

Live Poll

Do you believe politicians using specific labels to reframe issues changes how you vote?