Senate Democrats Introduced Data Broker Transparency Bill
The proposed legislation sought to grant consumers rights to view, correct, and restrict the sale of their personal information.
Updated on Oct. 11, 2026 in Cybersecurity
Live Poll
Should federal law require data brokers to obtain consumer permission before selling personal information?
On March 5, 2015, four U.S. Senators introduced the Data Broker Accountability and Transparency Act, or S. 668. This proposed federal bill aimed to regulate companies that aggregate and sell personal data to third parties.
Why it matters
The measure was designed to establish a legal framework protecting the right to privacy by curbing how third-party data brokers monetize personal records. It sought to balance consumer control with the commercial interests of the data brokerage industry.
The legislation established a formal identifier, S. 668, to categorize companies defined by their collection and sale of personal data. The effectiveness of these proposed enforcement mechanisms remains unknown.
The players
Edward J. Markey
A U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the legislation to increase regulatory oversight of data collection practices.
Richard Blumenthal
A U.S. Senator focused on consumer protection issues who joined the introduction of the S. 668 bill.
Direct Marketing Association
An industry trade group that publicly opposed the legislative efforts to restrict data brokerage operations.
Consumer Watchdog
A non-profit advocacy organization that provided support for the legislative push for data broker transparency.
The details
The bill proposed a mechanism for consumers to access, audit, and request corrections for information held by data brokers. It functioned by asserting individual control over the collection and sale of data to third parties, a process that historically operates without direct consumer visibility.
Timeline
March 5, 2015: Senate Democrats introduced the Data Broker Accountability and Transparency Act.
The Tech Race
The introduction of S. 668 marked a federal effort to address the unregulated sale of personal information. This proposal anticipated a broader trend of privacy-focused legislative attempts to curb the influence of third-party data aggregation.
The bill intended to grant consumers the ability to correct inaccurate personal files held by brokers. As a 2015 proposal, its practical impact on individual privacy rights remains limited by its legislative status.
The takeaway
The bill highlights an early attempt to codify digital privacy rights by forcing transparency upon the data brokerage industry. Observers may track whether similar consumer-control mechanisms reappear in future federal privacy debates.
Further reading
For more on the regulatory landscape regarding information security, visit the Cybersecurity archive.
Source note: This article includes information reported by MediaPost.
Live Poll
Should federal law require data brokers to obtain consumer permission before selling personal information?
