Court Dismissed Patent Suit Against The EVERY Company

A Delaware federal court ended the precision-fermentation patent dispute, finding no basis for legal claims.

Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Biotech

Isometric editorial illustration showing a stainless steel bioreactor tank, representing precision fermentation processes in the food-technology sector.
A federal court in Delaware dismissed a patent lawsuit brought by Onego Bio against The EVERY Company regarding precision-fermentation production. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should courts allow food tech firms to aggressively pursue patent challenges against their direct competitors?

A federal court in Delaware has dismissed a patent lawsuit filed by Onego Bio against The EVERY Company regarding ovalbumin production. The court concluded that The EVERY Company had not issued legal threats, characterizing their past statements as commercial puffery.

Why it matters

The decision ends a significant legal dispute between two companies competing in the precision-fermented protein sector. It highlights the high threshold for firms to initiate declaratory judgment actions over patent infringement in the absence of direct litigation threats.

The dispute centered on US Patent No. 12,096,784, a point of contention that remains active in foreign jurisdictions including Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Europe. While Onego Bio produces ovalbumin using the fungus Trichoderma reesei, The EVERY Company utilizes yeast.

The players

Onego Bio

A food-tech company using Trichoderma reesei to produce animal-free egg protein.

The EVERY Company

A startup founded in 2014 that uses yeast for protein production.

The details

Onego Bio sought a declaratory judgment to establish non-infringement and invalidate the '784 patent, which relates to precision-fermented ovalbumin production. The court found that The EVERY Company did not take affirmative steps to threaten litigation, rendering the suit premature. Precision fermentation is a process that uses microorganisms to produce specific proteins normally derived from animals.

Timeline

  1. September 2025: Onego Bio filed the lawsuit in Delaware.

  2. May 2026: A parallel patent lawsuit in Wisconsin was dismissed.

  3. October 13, 2026: The Delaware court dismissed the lawsuit.

The Tech Race

This decision follows the precedent set by the Wisconsin court, which dismissed a parallel case in May 2026. The outcome concludes domestic litigation for these firms while Onego Bio continues to navigate ongoing patent proceedings in Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Europe.

Onego Bio remains active in the U.S. market, continuing to sell its Bioalbumen protein to customers. The company is currently planning a new production facility in Jefferson County, Wisconsin.

The takeaway

The court's dismissal reinforces the difficulty of preemptive patent litigation without explicit threats. Observers should track Onego Bio's ongoing patent proceedings in Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Europe to see if international courts reach different conclusions regarding the '784 patent.

Further reading

Learn more about the evolving landscape of cellular agriculture in the Biotech section.

Live Poll

Should courts allow food tech firms to aggressively pursue patent challenges against their direct competitors?