President Trump Proposes New Names for Major Waterways
The administration aims to establish federal naming standards for the Pacific Ocean and the Strait of Hormuz.
Updated on Oct. 22, 2026 in Geography
Live Poll
Should the federal government have the authority to unilaterally rename established geographic landmarks?
President Donald Trump has proposed renaming the Pacific Ocean and the Strait of Hormuz to the American Ocean or Trump Ocean and Trump Strait, respectively. These proposals follow a series of executive orders aimed at altering geographic names for federal use.
Why it matters
The naming proposals represent an ongoing effort by the administration to project American identity and control over international geography through federal executive action. This strategy leverages presidential authority to override existing nomenclature for federal administrative purposes.
Federal executive orders have previously mandated name changes for domestic and international features, including renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America and restoring the name Mount McKinley.
The players
President Donald Trump
The President of the United States who utilizes executive orders to redefine geographic nomenclature for federal use.
The details
The president uses executive orders to mandate specific geographic naming conventions for all federal documentation and usage. These actions establish administrative standards for how the government identifies global features, distinct from international naming conventions maintained by non-US bodies.
Timeline
First day in office: President signed Executive Order 14172.
July 2026: President Donald J. Trump Bridge was unveiled in Tennessee.
August 2026: Executive order renamed Lake Ontario to Lake America for federal use.
October 22, 2026: Official public announcement of the new renaming proposals.
The Tech Race
These naming initiatives extend the precedent set by Executive Order 14172 to international waters. The strategy follows earlier attempts to alter domestic landmarks, such as the effort to rename New Mexico which was rejected due to local legal requirements.
These administrative changes primarily affect federal documentation and maps utilized by government agencies. For the public and international bodies, the names remain subject to broader diplomatic and local naming conventions where federal law does not reach.
The takeaway
The administration continues to assert federal control over global geography through executive naming mandates. Observers should track if these proposals are formally integrated into official federal maritime charts.
Further reading
Explore deeper historical and administrative impacts of naming conventions in Geography.
Live Poll
Should the federal government have the authority to unilaterally rename established geographic landmarks?
