Army Picks BWXT Reactor for Fort Campbell Power

The Janus Program's commercial model could reshape how military bases get nuclear power, though the reactor is still in the selection stage.

Updated on Nov. 2, 2026 in Nuclear

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a cylindrical reactor vessel beside a low cooling structure on open flat ground, in deep red and cream.
BWX Technology's Army-selected reactor for Fort Campbell's Janus Program, announced as the military moves toward commercially owned nuclear power, helped lift third-quarter earnings to $102 million. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should the U.S. invest more in nuclear energy to strengthen energy security?

BWX Technology reported third-quarter net earnings of $102 million, or $1.11 a share, up from $82.2 million, or $0.89 a share, a year earlier. Revenue reached $953 million, compared with $866.3 million in the year-ago quarter. The Army's Janus Program selection is an announced deployment plan, not an operating reactor.

Why it matters

The company attributed the earnings growth to energy security challenges that require nuclear solutions, with government operations revenue rising to $639.1 million from $616.7 million. The Army's selection of BWXT's Advanced Nuclear Reactor technology for the Janus Program signals a shift toward commercially owned and operated nuclear power for military installations.

The quarterly results show net earnings of $102 million on revenue of $953 million, a margin of roughly 10.7 percent, compared with about 9.5 percent a year earlier. Government operations generated $122.6 million in operating income on $639.1 million in revenue, a margin of about 19 percent, up from roughly 15.8 percent in the prior-year quarter.

The players

BWX Technology (BWXT)

A Lynchburg, Va.-based nuclear components and services company that produces highly enriched uranium fuel and reactor parts for the U.S. Navy's submarine fleet.

U.S. Army

The military branch that selected BWXT's Advanced Nuclear Reactor technology for the Janus Program at Fort Campbell, Ky.

Antares Nuclear

A reactor developer that entered a multi-year tri-structural fuel agreement with BWXT Advanced Fuels.

The details

BWXT produces highly enriched uranium fuel and other reactor parts at facilities in Ohio, Indiana, Tennessee and Virginia, and its fuel and reactors power the U.S. Navy's Ohio-, Virginia-, and Columbia-class submarines. The Janus Program is a joint effort between the Army and the Department of Energy to move the military toward a commercially owned-and-operated model, in which a private company owns and runs a reactor that supplies power to a military base. BWXT Advanced Fuels also signed a multi-year tri-structural fuel agreement with Antares Nuclear, a reactor developer.

Timeline

  1. Third quarter 2026: BWX Technology reported $102 million in net earnings.

  2. Monday: the company discussed quarterly results with analysts on a conference call.

  3. 2027: the company expects commercial nuclear demand to convert into firm orders.

The Tech Race

The Janus Program moves the military from government-built reactors toward commercially owned-and-operated systems, placing BWXT's Advanced Nuclear Reactor in direct competition with other private reactor developers seeking military contracts. BWXT's Antares fuel agreement and its existing Navy submarine work position it to supply both the fuel and the reactor hardware in that race.

The Janus selection is at the selection stage, so no Fort Campbell power is available to base residents yet, and the timeline for reactor construction was not given in the source. Civilian readers will see the effect mainly through how quickly commercially owned military reactors move from selection to operation.

The takeaway

Watch whether BWXT converts its commercial nuclear demand into firm orders in 2027, as the company projects. That conversion, along with progress on the Janus reactor at Fort Campbell, will show whether the commercially owned military model is moving from selection to construction.

Further reading

For more on the policy shaping military nuclear power, explore the Nuclear section.

Live Poll

Should the U.S. invest more in nuclear energy to strengthen energy security?